Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Topic: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Replies: 26   Last Post: Oct 20, 2012 12:26 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Louis Talman

Posts: 4,475
Registered: 12/27/05
Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Posted: Oct 18, 2012 12:56 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply
att1.html (4.0 K)

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Robert Hansen <bob@rsccore.com> wrote:

> I guess it was the atoms, coffee, coconuts and tractors that threw me off.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rational_function
>
> Now tell us what you meant when you said "Then all three of them have much
> to answer for." :)
>
> Bob Hansen
>
> On Oct 17, 2012, at 8:32 PM, Louis Talman <talmanl@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Robert Hansen <bob@rsccore.com> wrote:
>
> How do you handle units? Like 12 miles or 14 hours?

>>
>
> That's a very good question. How does one handle units in general? What
> axioms does one use? If there are none, then Robert's earlier question
> about an exam is well-posed: "Is this mathematics?"
>
>

>> How do you show a rational function between polynomials, such that a
>> student can see it and simplify it or factor it?
>>

>
> What on earth is "a rational function between polynomials"? Dare I ask,
> "Is this mathematics?"?
>
> --Louis A. Talman
> Department of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
> Metropolitan State College of Denver
>
> <http://rowdy.mscd.edu/%7Etalmanl>
>
> The word "between" doesn't even appear in the webpage you sent me, and you

left both my questions unanswered. Maybe I should answer your question in
the same spirit that you answered mine by saying:

They must answer for atoms, coffee, coconuts and tractors.

More seriously, you surely know that colleges and universities have
effective procedures in place for dealing with suspect scholarship. Look up
the charlatan, Ward Churchill, to find out how they work. (You can start on
my own website, at the URL in my sig. After that, Google is your friend.)

Did Bishop and Milgram made any effort to address Boaler's work through
those channels---which is what any respectable academic should do when they
think they've found such matter. If not, then their vitriolic (a word
already employed, quite reasonably, by others) reaction smacks more of
vigilantism than of academics. And that they chose not to do so would hint
very strongly at the weakness of their case.

They could, of course, still do so. But my guess is that they know better.
And they, too, might look up the Churchill case. What it is established
that he did is no worse than what they've suggested Boaler did, and if
there is truth to their accusations, her university should find it once a
formal complaint, which includes the evidence they say they have, is
lodged. And, it is important to note, there is typically no restriction on
who may lodge such a complaint.

--Louis A. Talman
Department of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
Metropolitan State College of Denver

<http://rowdy.msudenver.edu/%7Etalmanl>


Date Subject Author
10/7/12
Read In favor of teaching "dot notation"
kirby urner
10/13/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Joe Niederberger
10/15/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
kirby urner
10/13/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Joe Niederberger
10/16/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Joe Niederberger
10/16/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
kirby urner
10/17/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Joe Niederberger
10/17/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Paul A. Tanner III
10/17/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
kirby urner
10/17/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Joe Niederberger
10/17/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
kirby urner
10/17/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Paul A. Tanner III
10/17/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
kirby urner
10/17/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Robert Hansen
10/17/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Louis Talman
10/17/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Robert Hansen
10/18/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Louis Talman
10/18/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Robert Hansen
10/18/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
kirby urner
10/17/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Joe Niederberger
10/17/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
kirby urner
10/19/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Joe Niederberger
10/19/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Robert Hansen
10/19/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Joe Niederberger
10/19/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
kirby urner
10/19/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Joe Niederberger
10/20/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
kirby urner

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.