So, in the Jo Boaler issue in question, is Jo Boaler the good guy and are James Milgram and Wayne Bishop the bad guys? OR:
Is it the other way around - Jo Boaler the bad guy and James Milgram and Wayne Bishop the good guys?
In my view (after having read, fairly carefully, the 30+messages in this thread), the result is a stalemate:
The pro-Jo Boaler people have become yet more confirmed in their opinion that Jo Boaler is the good guy; as have the pro-J. Milgram + W. Bishop people been firmly confirmed in their contrary opinion that J. Milgram + W. Bishop are the good guys!