The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Is "Education Research" "Scientific Research" ? YES!"
Replies: 6   Last Post: Oct 24, 2012 11:30 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Robert Hansen

Posts: 11,345
From: Florida
Registered: 6/22/09
Re: Is "Education Research" "Scientific Research" ? YES!"
Posted: Oct 20, 2012 7:58 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply
att1.html (5.3 K)

Does it have to be published for you to judge its truthfulness or its validity? The reader should note that the truthfulness and validity of the Bishop/Milgram paper has not been questioned as has been the case with the Boaler paper. Not even by Hake.

Bob Hansen

On Oct 19, 2012, at 5:59 PM, Richard Hake <> wrote:

> Some subscribers to Math-Teach might be interested in a recent post "Is 'Education Research' 'Scientific Research' ? YES!" [Hake (2012)]. The abstract reads:
> *********************************************
> ABSTRACT: GS Chandy at <> wrote (liberally paraphrasing and drastically condensing); "Judging from his posts on the over 40-post Math-Teach thread 'Jo Boaler reveals attacks by Milgram and Bishop' at <>, Robert Hansen is wrong in his claim that 'Education Research' is not 'Scientific Research.' "
> To which Hansen at <> responded with the following statement (paraphrasing) of which the 2nd and 3rd sentences are blatantly false (as I indicate in this post): "In scientific research, conclusions are tested repeatedly by many different researchers. In educational research, they are not. One does a study, claims success, publishes it and that is the end of it."
> The National Academies' "Scientific Research in Education" at <> suggests six guiding principles that underlie all scientific inquiry, including education research: (1) Pose Significant Questions That Can Be Investigated Empirically, (2) Link Research to Relevant Theory, (3) Use Methods That Permit Direct Investigation of the Question, (4) Provide a Coherent and Explicit Chain of Reasoning, (5) Replicate and Generalize Across Studies, and (6) Disclose Research to Encourage Professional Scrutiny and Critique.
> In my opinion Jo Boaler's research - see the material at <> & <> and Boaler & Staples (2008) at <> - satisfies all the above criteria, whereas the unpublished, undated, and referenceless denunciation of Boaler's research by Bishop, Clopton, & Milgram at <> does not.
> *********************************************
> To access the complete 12 kB post please click on <>.
> Richard Hake, Emeritus Professor of Physics, Indiana University
> Links to Articles: <>
> Links to Socratic Dialogue Inducing (SDI) Labs: <>
> Academia: <>
> Blog: <>
> GooglePlus: <>
> Twitter: <>
> REFERENCES [All URL's shortened by <> and accessed on 19 Oct 2012.]
> Hake, R.R. 2012. "Is 'Education Research' 'Scientific Research' ? YES!" online on the OPEN! AERA-L archives at <>. Post of 19 Oct 2012 13:11:11-0700 to AERA-L and Net-Gold. The abstract and link to the complete post are being transmitted to several discussion lists and are also on my blog "Hake'sEdStuff" at <> with a provision for comments.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.