Jo Boaler made claims of incredible success. Bishop et al did what any good researcher does, verify. In fact, I would say that bishop et al showed more interest in Boaler's work than her supporters here. Also, no one refutes the damning evidence provided by Bishop et al, and how could they?
On Oct 20, 2012, at 7:50 AM, GS Chandy <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Could these reactions of Professor Wayne Bishop's possibly be because his own grant proposals are usually turned down, causing him extreme 'Grant Envy', so to speak?