Robert Hansen (RH) posted Oct 21, 2012 9:59 PM (GSC's remarks follow): > You've stated this on practically everything you have > commented on. > > Bob Hansen > > On Oct 20, 2012, at 9:10 PM, GS Chandy > <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > > > i) I've not studied the Bishop/Milgram paper in > question; I shall try to do that in future. > AGAIN you lie.
Shall we do a count - AFTER you've defined just what you mean by "practically everything"? (Let's use your best 'scientific research' criteria for this count!)
(Allow me to let you into a secret: I confess that I do indeed sometimes - as a matter of fact, very few times - state that I've not read a certain something or the other, and that I would or might comment AFTER I have read it. This is because I have no desire to be proven either a fool or a liar, unlike some others here we could name).
GSC ("Still Shoveling Away!" - with apologies if due to Barry Garelick for any tedium caused; and with the observation that all this tedium is EASILY avoided by the simple expedient of not opening any messages purported to have originated from GSC)