Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Topic: In Defense of the NRC's "Scientific Research in Education'"
Replies: 3   Last Post: Oct 27, 2012 1:08 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Robert Hansen

Posts: 7,484
From: Florida
Registered: 6/22/09
Re: In Defense of the NRC's "Scientific Research in Education'"
Posted: Oct 27, 2012 1:08 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply


On Oct 27, 2012, at 11:29 AM, Haim <hpipik@netzero.com> wrote:

> Robert Hansen Posted: Oct 27, 2012 10:21 AM
>

>> The only substitute for hard science is hard science and
>> hard science is only obtainable through critical
>> discourse. Something that education research seems to
>> not only lack, but despises.

>
> "Despise"? No doubt there is some of that, but the better word might be "fear".
>
> Haim
> No representation without taxation.



Well, they are in the wrong business (science) then. And I think they know that. They are more comfortable with it being as Wayne describes it, a religion. You are either a member of the flock or you are not.

Bob Hansen



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.