On Oct 29, 10:42 am, Arturo Magidin <magi...@member.ams.org> wrote: > Given that there is a straighforward, direct proof of Cantor's Theorem that holds in ZF, why would any reputable publishing house waste *anyone's* time peer-reviewing the arguments presented against? > -- > Arturo Magidin
RIGHT! NO UNIVERSITY ON EARTH would be the 1st to admit they took 100 YEARS to stop ramming down everyone's throats
SIZE(SET) > SIZE({1,2,3...}) SIZE(SET) > INFINITY
which is BANNED WORD NOW!
Based on DEFINITIONS of NON-TERMINATING DIGITS {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}
1234.. 7655.. 3456.. 9887.. ..
DIAG = 1657...
X = 2768...
-----
ARE YOU SURE THAT PROVES SET SIZES BIGGER THAN INFINITY EXIST?
Because HALF THE PLANET CANT SEE IT and the 1000 ENYCLOPEDIAS on YOUR ABSTRACT REAL MODELS prevents any FORMAL WORK FROM PROCEEDING!
