> On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 17:41:59 -0700 (PDT), Arturo Magidin > <magidin@member.ams.org> wrote: > > > Huh? > > > > Sorry, but that statement makes absolute no sense > > whatsoever to me. What exactly was the point you > > were attempting to make? > > That I am not arguing with the conclusion that Cantor's Theorem is > true, I am questioning whether the diagonal argument is coherent. > > How can this be unclear? >
Because you haven't defined what "coherent" means in this context.
