"Peter Webb" <webbfamilyDIEspamDie@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message news:k6l6as$h0q$1@news.albasani.net...
> As you haven't told us what "w" and "m" are supposed to be, or the rule > that you are using to form the list, this cannot be done.
Parrot, at least read bloody Cantor's argument before pontificating your dogma.
> If you think you have a list of all Reals, post it here, and I will > happily prove its not a list of all Reals by finding a Real not on the > list for you.
But you can do no such thing: the anti-diagonal is just not a real number.
