On Monday, October 29, 2012 9:27:27 AM UTC+2, LudovicoVan wrote: > "Peter Webb" <webbfamilyDIEspamDie@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message > > news:k6l6as$h0q$1@news.albasani.net... > > > > > As you haven't told us what "w" and "m" are supposed to be, or the rule > > > that you are using to form the list, this cannot be done. > > > > Parrot, at least read bloody Cantor's argument before pontificating your > > dogma. > > > > > If you think you have a list of all Reals, post it here, and I will > > > happily prove its not a list of all Reals by finding a Real not on the > > > list for you. > > > > But you can do no such thing: the anti-diagonal is just not a real number.
*** Hehe... Thank you for your posting. Hopefully the OP's reading all the idiocies you and other cranks are posting here and begins to realize from where the wind blows.
We're just missing now some nonsenses from WM adn perhas 1-2 more and the jests circus will be complete...again!
