> "JRStern" <JRStern@foobar.invalid> wrote in message > news:email@example.com... > > Are there any such published? > > > > I can see in the archives here it's a common topic, > and I have my own > > crackpot theories which certainly overlap a lot of > the more popular > > objections. > > > > I don't want to prove or assert or reject any > statement about the > > countability of reals, I just want to consider the > validity of the > > diagonalization argument. > > > > Has anybody put that out in a refereed journal or a > respectable > > publisher? Even if it's just a prettier rejection > of crank theories, > > it would seem worthwhile. > > Do you still believe in fairy tales? Do you really > believe that this > diatribe or that the journals have anything to do > with truth or validity in > mathematics and mathematical arguments (or, in fact, > in any other > discipline)? Can't you see or guess the level of > fraud that is nowadays > intrinsic to the global government of societies? > Can't you see that it is > not even about lying to establish a fake reality, it > is plain lying for > lying and denial for denial, of life and > intelligence, i.e. about anything > and everything so that the rational discourse itself > is fucked up from the > start? Can't you see that this is the last > domination strategy, as so > acutely anticipated by Orwell? Can't you see that > this empire governs by > shuttering cultures and cultural continuity? And, of > course, it is not just > ideology: they are literally wiping out (killing!) > the whole adult > generation around the world,
Really? Any proof/documentation?
in order to destroy any > remaining of cultural > continuity. A world of crazy, nasty and easily to > manipulate *orphans*, > permanently in war one another, that's what they are > building. > 'They'?
> Cantorian theory is all invalid,
Because..? Do you not agree that |P(S)|>|S|?
Where is the standard proof wrong? Where are the
mistakes/contradictions that follow a false assumption?
and as such perfect > for this empire to > establish the truth of falsity and the falsity of > truth, or whatever, at > will: and those who won't buy it will be wiped out > with the guns.
Seems too far-out; mathematicians intentionally hiding
the truth in coordination with governments (others?) that
want to keep people ignorant?
> > The king is dead: long live the king. > > -LV > >