No enumeration function! Just a good ole countable SET of all reals!
The order is arbitrary isn't it?
> > Otherwise your claim to prove anything given any ENUMER-ABLE SET OF > > REALS clearly appears to have failed on the set provided 5 times > > already. > > > Herc > > I made no such claim. To start off with, its nonsense.
Nonetheless it was the topic before you took over from Moeblee.
On Oct 30, 9:18 am, MoeBlee <modem...@gmail.com> wrote: > I just proved that given any enumerable set S of denumerable binary > sequences there is denumerable binary sequence not in S.
If you do not wish to apply any mathematical approach to the given countable set of reals,