On Tuesday, October 30, 2012 7:15:26 AM UTC+2, Graham Cooper wrote:
> > but you answered his Question beautifully, 'no University would sink > > to peer review any critique on Cantor's theory'. > > > > This is synonymous with - 'if Cantor's theory was full of holes, we > > wouldn't know it!' >
*** No, you poor lost soul. It is synonymous with "Under the widely accepted and by default assumed ZFC theory, Cantor's theorem/theory is so very well founded, proved and accepted that the mathematical community won't be wasting its valuable time with cranks, trolls and any other kind of swarming feeble-minded individuals with a huge thirst for publicity and close to zero knowledge of logic and mathematics. That's left for unmoderated internet sites like...google sci.math, say." ****
> Thank you for your input!
*** Thank you for your output, as weak and stupid as it is. It at least provides some healthy, easy laugh and that's always welcome. ****
