|
|
Re: Of Interest
Posted:
Oct 30, 2012 12:51 AM
|
|
|
|
There are a couple of things that bother me about this suggestion.
1. You seem to be suggesting that the Proceedings of the National Academy
of Science is a third-rate journal.
2. You seem to be suggesting that you can "fry" someone else's conclusions
without showing that they aren't repeatable.
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Robert Hansen <bob@rsccore.com> wrote:
> Oh geez, didn't I fry this rat based numeracy theory once before. Joe,
> help me out here.:)
>
> Bob Hansen
>
>
> On Oct 29, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Louis Talman <talmanl@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> <http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/10/121028154914.htm>
>
> --
> --Louis A. Talman
> Department of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
> Metropolitan State College of Denver
>
> <http://rowdy.mscd.edu/%7Etalmanl>
>
>
>
--
--Louis A. Talman
Department of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
Metropolitan State College of Denver
<http://rowdy.mscd.edu/%7Etalmanl>
|
|
