On Oct 30, 3:46 am, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Oct 30, 9:18 am, MoeBlee <modem...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I just proved that given any enumerable set S of denumerable binary > > sequences there is denumerable binary sequence not in S. > > If you do not wish to apply any mathematical approach to the given > countable set of reals, > > 0.000000.. 0.110000.. 0.111010.. 0.111110.. ... > 0.000111.. 0.101000.. 0.000010.. 0.001100.. ... > 0.111000.. 0.010010.. 0.001010.. 0.101010.. ... > 0.111100.. 0.001011.. 0.000011.. 0.111111.. ... > ... > > then I have nothing more to add about countable complete sets of > reals.
Good! Indeed, good that you have no more to say about it.
