|
|
Re: Of Interest
Posted:
Oct 31, 2012 1:26 AM
|
|
|
|
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Robert Hansen <bob@rsccore.com> wrote:
> The researchers get away with this because the majority of people, like
> you, are so accustomed to proofs only in the positive, that they not only
> miss the contradiction, they can't even see it when someone points it out
> to them.
>
> Bob Hansen
>
This is hardly worth an answer. Contradicting another model isn't ground
for rejecting a model. Failing to make meaningful predictions is. Producing
experimental results that contradict the model is.
You haven't produced either of these conditions. All you've said is that
the model contradicts your pet theories. Quantum mechanics contradicted a
lot of pet theories. So did Copernicus.
So get real.
--
--Louis A. Talman
Department of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
Metropolitan State College of Denver
<http://rowdy.mscd.edu/%7Etalmanl>
|
|
