|
|
Re: Peer-reviewed arguments against Cantor Diagonalization
Posted:
Oct 31, 2012 2:58 PM
|
|
"LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> writes:
> "Jesse F. Hughes" <jesse@phiwumbda.org> wrote in message
> news:87fw4usk5z.fsf@phiwumbda.org...
>> "LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> writes:
>>> "Jesse F. Hughes" <jesse@phiwumbda.org> wrote in message
>>> news:87k3u6sodj.fsf@phiwumbda.org...
> <snipped>
>
>>>> But when we judge your capacity for reasoning in general, we may well
>>>> remember your screed that ZFC is a falsehood perpetrated on the masses
>>>> just because, well, the illuminati are so darned used to lying that they
>>>> lie about math, too.
>>>
>>> I judge too mate, and you now find out where exactly I said that ZFC is
>>> the
>>> root of evil.
>>
>> To be perfectly honest, I've no idea how I ought to interpret the above
>> response. I've no idea what you mean.
>>
>> Are you indeed honestly saying that ZFC is the root of evil? Or is this
>> sarcastic? For myself, I haven't a clue.
>
> Argh! My bad (English): I meant to say please find out where exactly I said
> that ZFC is the root of evil, intending that I have never said any such
> thing. My tirades have to do with global politics and policies, not with
> this or that specifics.
I never said you thought that set theory was a root of evil, but, near
as I can figger, you said that it was a symptom of a lying culture which
lies just 'cause it can. In an honest culture, we would all admit that
set theory is a plain falsehood.
If this is an accurate representation of what you meant, then you are
indeed an idiot.
If not, feel free to correct my misunderstanding of your insights.
--
Jesse F. Hughes
"That's what's brutal about mathematics! When you're wrong, you can
have spent years, and lots of effort, and come out at the end with
nothing." -- James S. Harris on the path of self-discovery (?)
|
|
