> "Jesse F. Hughes" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message > news:email@example.com... >> "LudovicoVan" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes: >>> "Jesse F. Hughes" <email@example.com> wrote in message >>> news:firstname.lastname@example.org... > <snipped> > >>>> But when we judge your capacity for reasoning in general, we may well >>>> remember your screed that ZFC is a falsehood perpetrated on the masses >>>> just because, well, the illuminati are so darned used to lying that they >>>> lie about math, too. >>> >>> I judge too mate, and you now find out where exactly I said that ZFC is >>> the >>> root of evil. >> >> To be perfectly honest, I've no idea how I ought to interpret the above >> response. I've no idea what you mean. >> >> Are you indeed honestly saying that ZFC is the root of evil? Or is this >> sarcastic? For myself, I haven't a clue. > > Argh! My bad (English): I meant to say please find out where exactly I said > that ZFC is the root of evil, intending that I have never said any such > thing. My tirades have to do with global politics and policies, not with > this or that specifics.
I never said you thought that set theory was a root of evil, but, near as I can figger, you said that it was a symptom of a lying culture which lies just 'cause it can. In an honest culture, we would all admit that set theory is a plain falsehood.
If this is an accurate representation of what you meant, then you are indeed an idiot.
If not, feel free to correct my misunderstanding of your insights.
-- Jesse F. Hughes "That's what's brutal about mathematics! When you're wrong, you can have spent years, and lots of effort, and come out at the end with nothing." -- James S. Harris on the path of self-discovery (?)