Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: CANTORS PROOF IS JUST THE INDUCTIVE STEP!
Replies: 6   Last Post: Nov 1, 2012 5:31 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Hercules ofZeus

Posts: 27
Registered: 9/19/11
Re: CANTORS PROOF IS JUST THE INDUCTIVE STEP!
Posted: Nov 1, 2012 5:00 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Nov 1, 6:37 pm, William Elliot <ma...@panix.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Hercules ofZeus wrote:
> > > > INDUCTION RULE:
>
> > > > P(1) & P(n)->P(S(n))
> > > > --> ALL(n) P(n)

>
> > > You're wrong. The induction rule is:
> > > P(1) & ALL(n)(P(n) -> P(S(n))) -> ALL(n) P(n).

>
> > OK, in my new logic forall is variable function that uses the double
> > instantiaion rule.

>
> > p(1) ^ N(p(N)->p(s(N))
> > -> N(p(N))

>
> What's N?
>

> > CAPS = VARIABLES
>
> CAPS is a variable?
>

> > lower = terms / function terms.
>
> > i.e. the scope of N(...) is wider than the same variable name
> > (...N...)

>
> Huh?
>

> > Just my new high order logic syntax forwww.microPROLOG.com!
>
> Wow, a high order of junk logic.
>


Hey if you don't like the final frontier in mathematics..

p(1) ^ N(p(N)->p(s(N))
-> N(p(N))


I gain no benefit by sharing..

Herc
--
www.microPROLOG.com
if( if(t(S),f(R)) , if(t(R),f(S)) ).

if the sun's out then it's not raining
ergo
if it's raining then the sun's not out



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.