On Nov 1, 7:13 pm, William Elliot <ma...@panix.com> wrote: > On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Hercules ofZeus wrote: > > > > > > INDUCTION RULE: P(1) & P(n)->P(S(n)) --> ALL(n) P(n) > > > > > > You're wrong. The induction rule is: > > > > > P(1) & ALL(n)(P(n) -> P(S(n))) -> ALL(n) P(n). > > > > > OK, in my new logic forall is variable function that uses the double > > > > instantiaion rule. > > > > > p(1) ^ N(p(N)->p(s(N)) -> N(p(N)) > > > What's N? > > > > > CAPS = VARIABLES > > > CAPS is a variable? > > > > > lower = terms / function terms. i.e. the scope of N(...) is wider > > > > than the same variable name (...N...) > > > > Huh? > > > > > Just my new high order logic syntax forwww.microPROLOG.com! > > > Wow, a high order of junk logic. > > > Hey if you don't like the final frontier in mathematics.. > > Will this be the your final affrontier of mathematics? > > > p(1) ^ N(p(N)->p(s(N)) > > -> N(p(N)) > > > I gain no benefit by sharing.. > > 'Cause you've nothing to share. > > But if you really do need a friend with benefits, > should I benefit you my blocking your posts > instead of beamusing myself at your expense?
why would I care, I've never bothered to even open one of your own posts in 10 years.
Have you made one?
Meanwhile, I have a partially operational formal system to tweak... I'll leave the hand job mathematics for your well practiced ilk.