|
|
Re: Peer-reviewed arguments against Cantor Diagonalization
Posted:
Nov 1, 2012 6:38 AM
|
|
Graham Cooper <grahamcooper7@gmail.com> writes:
> Can you state explicitly what it proves?
>
> I don't see how MODUS PONENS might make this deduction.
>
> LHS->RHS & LHS -> RHS
>
> where RHS = "X > size({1,2,3...})"
>
> nor how the enumeration of a set and it's index inclusion or not has
> anything to do what's in the superset.
Sorry, Graham, I was hoping to have a conversation with someone a bit
more coherent today.
Some other time, perhaps.
--
Jesse F. Hughes
"I will admit I can get giddy over these forays into ideas at the
extreme edge. Being wrong can just add to the fun, oddly enough."
--James S. Harris just wants to have fun.
|
|
