The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Peer-reviewed arguments against Cantor Diagonalization
Replies: 23   Last Post: Nov 2, 2012 1:46 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Jesse F. Hughes

Posts: 9,776
Registered: 12/6/04
Re: Peer-reviewed arguments against Cantor Diagonalization
Posted: Nov 1, 2012 6:38 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Graham Cooper <> writes:

> Can you state explicitly what it proves?
> I don't see how MODUS PONENS might make this deduction.
> where RHS = "X > size({1,2,3...})"
> nor how the enumeration of a set and it's index inclusion or not has
> anything to do what's in the superset.

Sorry, Graham, I was hoping to have a conversation with someone a bit
more coherent today.

Some other time, perhaps.

Jesse F. Hughes
"I will admit I can get giddy over these forays into ideas at the
extreme edge. Being wrong can just add to the fun, oddly enough."
--James S. Harris just wants to have fun.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.