Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Peer-reviewed arguments against Cantor Diagonalization
Replies: 23   Last Post: Nov 2, 2012 1:46 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Jesse F. Hughes

Posts: 9,776
Registered: 12/6/04
Re: Peer-reviewed arguments against Cantor Diagonalization
Posted: Nov 1, 2012 6:38 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Graham Cooper <grahamcooper7@gmail.com> writes:

> Can you state explicitly what it proves?
>
> I don't see how MODUS PONENS might make this deduction.
>
> LHS->RHS & LHS -> RHS
>
> where RHS = "X > size({1,2,3...})"
>
> nor how the enumeration of a set and it's index inclusion or not has
> anything to do what's in the superset.


Sorry, Graham, I was hoping to have a conversation with someone a bit
more coherent today.

Some other time, perhaps.

--
Jesse F. Hughes
"I will admit I can get giddy over these forays into ideas at the
extreme edge. Being wrong can just add to the fun, oddly enough."
--James S. Harris just wants to have fun.



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.