On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Haim <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Lou Talman Posted: Nov 2, 2012 12:38 AM > > >And of course, we are to suppose that someone who sees a > >socialist behind every tree---and who says that every > >socialist is evil incarnate---is not "ideologically > >driven". > > I have no need of that hypothesis, and neither have you. > > I'm not the least surprised that you have no need of the observation (n.b., "observation", not "hypothesis". You've included "ideologically driven" in your argument against your putative "Education Mafia"; that they are "ideologically driven", you say, is one of the sins for which they must be punished.
What are we to think of someone who calls for action against people for being guilty of something of which he, himself, is a prime example?
--Louis A. Talman Department of Mathematical and Computer Sciences Metropolitan State College of Denver