Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: ALL(F):N->R is 2OL! NOT 1OL!!!!!!
Replies: 6   Last Post: Nov 15, 2012 2:39 AM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Graham Cooper Posts: 4,495 Registered: 5/20/10
Re: ALL(F):N->R is 2OL! NOT 1OL!!!!!!
Posted: Nov 14, 2012 10:12 PM

On Nov 15, 10:47 am, George Greene <gree...@email.unc.edu> wrote:
> On Nov 14, 3:28 am, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>

> > Why are you citing ZFC to prove Cantor's proof 1 day and FOL the next?
>
> You are being REALLY stupid, Herc.
> ZFC *is* a FIRST-order theory.

WIKIPEDIA

For example, the second-order sentence
A(P) A(x) ( xeP v ~xeP )
says that for every set P of individuals and every individual x,
either x is in P or it is no

FOR EVERY SET P - 2ND ORDER YOU BUFFOON!

2nd ORDER is how AXIOMS ARE WRITTEN to RANGE OVER THE THEORY IT
PRODUCES.

You can't state 1 singlie fact about 1OL or 2OL without CONVULATING
THE CHARADE furhter and further in to lies and denial.

You NEVER USE 2OL - That's the SMOKING GUN YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU'RE