The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Cantor's argument and the Potential Infinite.
Replies: 17   Last Post: Nov 17, 2012 10:59 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 185
Registered: 4/18/12
Re: Cantor's argument and the Potential Infinite.
Posted: Nov 16, 2012 4:05 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article <k84tuf$t03$>,
"LudovicoVan" <> wrote:

> "Zuhair" <> wrote in message

> > We still can characterize Cardinality in this setting.
> And you keep missing the point, as the various objections of course involve
> that the standard definition of cardinality for infinite sets is wrong!

But as far as any valid arguments are concerned, it appears AT LEAST
equally likely that the various objections are the things that are
> > So Cantor's diagonal is applicable to potential infinity context!
> Cantor's arguments are *only* applied to potentially infinite sets, in fact
> in standard set theory there is no such thing as actual infinity at all.

ZFC offers a standard set theory in which actually infinite sets are not
only allowed but actually required to exist, and no one yet has been
able to show that ZFC is not a perfectly sound set theory.
> Please get your head out of your ass and read and try to understand what you
> are rebutting before you actually get to do it.

AS far as head-in-ass-itis, LV appears to have a far worse case of it
than those he is criticizing.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.