Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.math
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
topology definition question
Replies:
1
Last Post:
Nov 16, 2012 4:56 PM



Kaba
Posts:
289
Registered:
5/23/11


Re: topology definition question
Posted:
Nov 16, 2012 4:56 PM


16.11.2012 23:42, Daniel J. Greenhoe wrote: > It seems the most "common" definition of a topology is that T is a topology on a set X if > 1. empty set is in T and > 2. X is in T and > 3. A and B are in T ==> A intersection B is in T and > 4. {A_i} in T ==> Union A_i is in T. > > But some authors imply that only 3 and 4 are necessary for the definition of a topology. For example, Kelley ("General Topology", 1955, page 37) only uses 3 and 4 and says that these imply X is in T. McCarty ("Topology...", page 87) says 1 and 2 are "completely unneeded". > > My question is, is it really possible to exclude 1 and 2 from the definition such that 3 and 4 alone imply 1 and 2? > > Suppose X:={x,y,z} and T:={ {x},{y},{x,y} }. > Then T satisfies conditions 3 and 4, but yet X is not in T. > So how is it possible to exclude 3 from the definition of a topology?
By convention, the intersection of zero number of subsets of X is the whole space X. Similarly, the union of zero number of subsets of X is the empty set.
 http://kaba.hilvi.org



