Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 152
Replies: 53   Last Post: Nov 19, 2012 4:49 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 LudovicoVan Posts: 4,165 From: London Registered: 2/8/08
Re: Matheology § 152
Posted: Nov 17, 2012 2:39 PM

"Uirgil" <uirgil@uirgil.ur> wrote in message
news:uirgil-B4A0C7.11095217112012@BIGNEWS.USENETMONSTER.COM...
> In article <k88h5n\$eeo\$1@dont-email.me>,
> "LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> wrote:

>> "William Hughes" <wpihughes@gmail.com> wrote in message

>> > On Nov 17, 9:59 am, "LudovicoVan" <ju...@diegidio.name> wrote:
>> >> "William Hughes" <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> >>

>> >> > Note that *set* limits have some important properties.
>> >>
>> >> > Given a sequence of sets {B_1,B_2,B_3,...}
>> >> > then the set limit always exists (it
>> >> > may be the empty set).

>> >>
>> >> > If we have
>> >>
>> >> > A = set limit {B_1,B_2,B_3....}
>> >>
>> >> > Then
>> >>
>> >> > A is a set
>> >> > A cannot contain an element that is not contained
>> >> > in any of the B's

>> >>
>> >> Williams going around, in circles:
>> >>
>> >> It was already mentioned that it is wrong to use that specific
>> >> definition
>> >> to
>> >> solve the balls and vase problem.
>> >>
>> >> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limit_superior_and_limit_inferior#Special_cas
>> >> e:_discrete_metric>

>> >
>> > The problem is the above applies to *any* definition of a *set* limit.

>>
>> But those definitions are a *specific* case of these:
>>
>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limit_superior_and_limit_inferior#Sequences_of_s
>> ets>
>>
>> I sometimes wonder which planet you come from.

>
>
> Actually, William HUghes' "definition" is quite carefully non-specific,
> and while it certainly includes both a lim_sups and a lim_infs, is in no
> way limiter to only those.
>
> So that, as usual, LV has things inverted.

The one who has got something inverted here is you.

You are again invited to stop the spam and disturbance and kindly get lost.

-LV

Date Subject Author
11/16/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/16/12 William Hughes
11/16/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/16/12 LudovicoVan
11/16/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/16/12 Uirgil
11/16/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/16/12 LudovicoVan
11/16/12 Uirgil
11/16/12 William Hughes
11/16/12 Uirgil
11/17/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/17/12 LudovicoVan
11/17/12 LudovicoVan
11/17/12 Uirgil
11/17/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/17/12 Uirgil
11/17/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/17/12 LudovicoVan
11/17/12 William Hughes
11/17/12 trj
11/17/12 LudovicoVan
11/17/12 William Hughes
11/17/12 LudovicoVan
11/17/12 Uirgil
11/17/12 LudovicoVan
11/17/12 Uirgil
11/17/12 William Hughes
11/17/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/17/12 William Hughes
11/18/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/18/12 William Hughes
11/18/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/18/12 William Hughes
11/18/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/18/12 William Hughes
11/18/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/18/12 Vurgil
11/18/12 Vurgil
11/18/12 Vurgil
11/19/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/19/12 Vurgil
11/18/12 Vurgil
11/19/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/19/12 Vurgil
11/17/12 Uirgil
11/17/12 Uirgil
11/17/12 trj
11/17/12 Uirgil
11/17/12 Uirgil
11/17/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/17/12 Virgil
11/18/12 gus gassmann