On Nov 18, 7:11 am, George Greene <gree...@email.unc.edu> wrote: > > See this is the problem. > > > You just BAFFLE WITH BULLSHIT every assertion made that doesn't match > > your Library Of Logic Facts! > > .... > ..... > ..... > > > *IF* you had any credible mathematical capacity, > > you would ACKNOWLEDGE THE ARGUMENT FIRST. > > I*DID* acknowledge your argument first. *I*WAS* talking about YOUR > argument IN YOUR terms. >
NO YOU DIDN'T.
You used a DEBATING TECHNIQUE called A.R.T.S.
A-GREE - YES ITS COMPLETE R-ESTATE T-ELL STORY - TRUE ITS INCOMPLETE S-EE?
The ARGUMENT you ALWAYS IGNORE
is that CLOSED LOGIC IS CLOSED
You ALMOST MADE SENSE.
I did 2 YEARS of this stuff at UNI
They DELIBERATELY left out ZFC in the I.T. degree and for good reason.
They even used a SPECIFICATION LANGUAGE called Z to cover the omission of ZFC from I.T. degrees.