Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
|
|
Re: SCI.LOGIC is a STAGNANT CESS PITT of LOSERS!
Posted:
Nov 17, 2012 4:34 PM
|
|
On Nov 18, 7:11 am, George Greene <gree...@email.unc.edu> wrote:
> > See this is the problem.
>
> > You just BAFFLE WITH BULLSHIT every assertion made that doesn't match
> > your Library Of Logic Facts!
>
> ....
> .....
> .....
>
> > *IF* you had any credible mathematical capacity,
> > you would ACKNOWLEDGE THE ARGUMENT FIRST.
>
> I*DID* acknowledge your argument first. *I*WAS* talking about YOUR
> argument IN YOUR terms.
>
NO YOU DIDN'T.
You used a DEBATING TECHNIQUE called A.R.T.S.
A-GREE - YES ITS COMPLETE
R-ESTATE
T-ELL STORY - TRUE ITS INCOMPLETE
S-EE?
The ARGUMENT you ALWAYS IGNORE
is that CLOSED LOGIC IS CLOSED
You ALMOST MADE SENSE.
I did 2 YEARS of this stuff at UNI
They DELIBERATELY left out ZFC in the I.T. degree and for good reason.
They even used a SPECIFICATION LANGUAGE called Z to cover the omission
of ZFC from I.T. degrees.
You can EMBED mathematics in the CLOSED LOGIC.
someModel |= this-is-not-derivable-by-axiom-set(A1)
can be modelled as a liar statement in the 1 system.
Herc
|
|
|
|
