Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: SCI.LOGIC is a STAGNANT CESS PITT of LOSERS!
Replies: 1   Last Post: Nov 17, 2012 4:36 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View  
Hercules ofZeus

Posts: 27
Registered: 9/19/11
Re: SCI.LOGIC is a STAGNANT CESS PITT of LOSERS!
Posted: Nov 17, 2012 4:36 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Nov 18, 4:24 am, Frederick Williams <freddywilli...@btinternet.com>
wrote:
> Graham Cooper wrote:
>

> > FROM AXIOMS you DERIVE THEOREMS!
>
> > Nobody CARES if  SomeModel |=  'this is not derivable from your
> > axioms"

>
> > looks TRUE!
>
> > IT's not DERIVABLE FROM THE AXIOMS!   END OF STORY!
>
> How do you show that some formula (phi, let's say) is not derivable from
> the axioms?
>



You start with a naive specification of DERIVE(THEOREM)

You gave a rudimentary description of the method at one point, see how
you go!

Herc
--

TAUTOLOGIES
A B T TYPE
a a->c c Modus Ponens
d->e e->f d->f Transitivity
!(!d) TRUE d Double Negation
...
LOGIC
E(Y) Y={x|P(x)} <-> DERIVE( E(Y) Y={x|P(x)} )
DERIVE(T) <-> DERIVE(a) ^ DERIVE(b) ^ (a^b)->T
MATHEMATICS
E(Y) Y={x|P(x)} <-> PRVBLE( E(Y) Y={x|P(x)} )
PRVBLE(T) <-> NOT(DERIVE(NOT(T)))




Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.