|
|
Re: Matheology § 152
Posted:
Nov 18, 2012 1:02 PM
|
|
On 18 Nov., 18:45, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 18, 7:13 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>
> > On 17 Nov., 23:08, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Nov 17, 5:23 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>
> > > > On 17 Nov., 21:21, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > (nor is there a problem that WM two limits are different)-
>
> > > > Interesting. A nice claim.
> > > > The limit of a sequence may depend on the method which is used to
> > > > calculate it?
>
> > > Nope, but it does depend on which limit is used.
>
> > The Cauchy-limit or the Cantor-limit?
>
> Niether.
>
> The fact that in Wolkenmuekenheim the two limits
> are assumed to be the same does
> not mean that you are using the same limit both times.
Is it correct in mathematics to claim:
1/((((((10^0)/10)+10^1)/10)+10^2)/10)+? = 0 ?
And is it also correcr to claim
1/((((((10^0)/10)+10^1)/10)+10^2)/10)+? > 1 ?
Is it is therefore correct to claim 0 > 1?
Or can you give some guidelines for beginners, when and why which of
the limits has to be applied?
Regards, WM
|
|
