Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 154: Consistency Proof!
Replies: 101   Last Post: Nov 25, 2012 5:08 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de Posts: 18,076 Registered: 1/29/05
Re: Matheology § 154: Consistency Proof!
Posted: Nov 19, 2012 8:53 AM

On 19 Nov., 13:58, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 19, 6:28 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

> > On 19 Nov., 01:15, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Nov 18, 8:04 pm, Vurgil <Vur...@arg.erg> wrote:
>
> > > > In article

>
> > > >  WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > > > > Matheology 154: Consistency Proof!
>
> > > > > The long missed solution of an outstanding problem came from a
> > > > > completely unexpected side: Social science proves the consistency of
> > > > > matheology by carrying out a poll.

>
> > > > > As recently reported (see matheology 152)
> > > > >http://www.hs-augsburg.de/~mueckenh/KB/Matheology.pdf
> > > > > mathematics and matheology lead to different values of the continued
> > > > > fraction

>
> > > > > 1/((((((10^0)/10)+10^1)/10)+10^2)/10)+ = 0 (Cauchy)
> > > > > 1/((((((10^0)/10)+10^1)/10)+10^2)/10)+ > 1 (Cantor)

>
> > > > It is not at all clear that these expressions represent any continued
> > > > fraction at all.

>
> > > One of the problems with attempting any discussion with WM
> > > is the fact that he is unable or unwilling to define anything.

>
> Another is his habit of editing out  (without any indication)
> bits of posts he doesn't want to deal with.
>
> A third is the fact that while he insists that you make substantial
> effort to understand his incorrect and ambiguous stuff, he makes

A very good answer. So you can avoid any mathematical arguing. In
definition
1/((((((10^0)/10)+10^1)/10)+10^2)/10)+? = 0 (Cauchy)
1/((((((10^0)/10)+10^1)/10)+10^2)/10)+? > 1 (Cantor)
you quote a crippled and not understandable formula
1/((((((10^0)/10)+10^1)/10)+10^2)/10)+ = 0 (Cauchy)
1/((((((10^0)/10)+10^1)/10)+10^2)/10)+ > 1 (Cantor)

Really, it is interesting to see how you defend your position..

Regards, WM

Date Subject Author
11/18/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/18/12 Vurgil
11/18/12 William Hughes
11/18/12 Vurgil
11/19/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/19/12 Vurgil
11/19/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/19/12 William Hughes
11/19/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/19/12 Vurgil
11/20/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/20/12 Virgil
11/21/12 William Hughes
11/21/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/21/12 William Hughes
11/21/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/21/12 William Hughes
11/21/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/21/12 William Hughes
11/21/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/21/12 William Hughes
11/21/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/21/12 William Hughes
11/21/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/21/12 William Hughes
11/22/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/22/12 William Hughes
11/22/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/22/12 William Hughes
11/22/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/22/12 William Hughes
11/22/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/22/12 William Hughes
11/22/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/22/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12
11/23/12 Virgil
11/24/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/24/12 Virgil
11/23/12 Virgil
11/24/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/24/12 Virgil
11/25/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/25/12 Virgil
11/25/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/25/12 Virgil
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 Virgil
11/22/12 Virgil
11/22/12 Virgil
11/22/12 Virgil
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/22/12 Virgil
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/22/12 Virgil
11/21/12 Virgil
11/21/12 Virgil
11/21/12 Virgil
11/21/12 Virgil
11/21/12 Virgil
11/21/12 Virgil
11/22/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/19/12 Vurgil
11/20/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/20/12 Virgil
11/22/12 David Valdez