Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Objections against Cantor
Replies: 4   Last Post: Nov 19, 2012 7:13 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Rupert

Posts: 3,806
Registered: 12/6/04
Re: Objections against Cantor
Posted: Nov 19, 2012 11:18 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Nov 19, 11:47 am, Zuhair <zaljo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> (4) Ultrafinistism: Those restrict human mathematical reasoning to
> only feasible length descriptions, so it is more consistent than
> finitism, but yet it is too restrictive that most mathematicians see
> no clear justification for it to be true.
> The mere justification of what is available around us, and the finite
> nature of our abilities, is not a clear evidence of why should the
> universe abide by such inabilities. That's besides the fact that
> actual infinity through set construction is intelligible, so why
> commit ourselves to such a restriction based on some inability that
> the universe and reality around us might not necessarily copy and yet
> at the same time this non copying can still be touched by some of our
> descriptive apparatus though not in full as with ultra-finite matters.
>


You should have a look at the first chapter of Edward Nelson's
"Predicative Arithmetic", titled "The impredicativity of induction".



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.