Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 154: Consistency Proof!
Replies: 101   Last Post: Nov 25, 2012 5:08 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de Posts: 18,076 Registered: 1/29/05
Re: Matheology § 154: Consistency Proof!
Posted: Nov 20, 2012 1:41 AM

On 19 Nov., 23:08, Vurgil <Vur...@arg.erg> wrote:

> > That is my impression of your reaction. But in oder to test it, here
> > is the complete representation of the continued fraction C:

>
> > C = (((...((((((10^0)/10)+10^1)/10)+10^2)/10)+... )+10^n)/10)+...
>
> > Now take the reciproce and find 1/C = 0 or 1/C > 1? Which one is the
> > correct value?

>
> Then C is NOT in the form of a continued fraction at all, at least not
> of any standard type.

That is of no importance. C is a never ending, i.e. continued
fraction.
>
> And WM has provided no reason to suspect that the process has any limit
> at all-

1/C is a real number. The question remain: Which one is it? 0,
according to mathematics, or >1 , according to set theory.

Regards, WM

Date Subject Author
11/18/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/18/12 Vurgil
11/18/12 William Hughes
11/18/12 Vurgil
11/19/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/19/12 Vurgil
11/19/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/19/12 William Hughes
11/19/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/19/12 Vurgil
11/20/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/20/12 Virgil
11/21/12 William Hughes
11/21/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/21/12 William Hughes
11/21/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/21/12 William Hughes
11/21/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/21/12 William Hughes
11/21/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/21/12 William Hughes
11/21/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/21/12 William Hughes
11/21/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/21/12 William Hughes
11/22/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/22/12 William Hughes
11/22/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/22/12 William Hughes
11/22/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/22/12 William Hughes
11/22/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/22/12 William Hughes
11/22/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/22/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12
11/23/12 Virgil
11/24/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/24/12 Virgil
11/23/12 Virgil
11/24/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/24/12 Virgil
11/25/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/25/12 Virgil
11/25/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/25/12 Virgil
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 Virgil
11/22/12 Virgil
11/22/12 Virgil
11/22/12 Virgil
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/22/12 Virgil
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/22/12 Virgil
11/21/12 Virgil
11/21/12 Virgil
11/21/12 Virgil
11/21/12 Virgil
11/21/12 Virgil
11/21/12 Virgil
11/22/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/19/12 Vurgil
11/20/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/20/12 Virgil
11/22/12 David Valdez