Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.math
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
spin is a geometry direction and has only three values 1/2, 0, +1/2 Chapt13.4.03 Charge and spin #1021 New Physics #1141 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
Replies:
3
Last Post:
Nov 22, 2012 2:36 AM




spin is a geometry direction and has only three values 1/2, 0, +1/2 Chapt13.4.03 Charge and spin #1021 New Physics #1141 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
Posted:
Nov 22, 2012 1:24 AM


On Nov 21, 7:30 pm, Timothy Sutter <a202010202...@lycos.com> wrote:
> > so, =precession= is an intrinsic behavior > > of these spinning objects. > > they all "wobble" as if they were slowing down. > > but what does this have to do with charge? > > it's not like the electrons were running on electricity > > like they had little electric motors inside of them > > and you had to charge them up to get them to spin... > > or is it? > > no, they claim that the spin is "intrinsic" > > and that tends to mean that they'd be spinning anyway > > but, if you were at absolute zero > > all motion should stop...
Hi Tim,
Now notice the helium atom belongs to the s orbital whereas the other inert gases belong to the p orbital. And s orbitals are fully spherical whereas p orbitals (whether you can do a ascii of a p orbital?) is elongated elliptical shaped.
Now we know from the Maxwell Equations, the Ampere law says that parallel currents attract one another.
And if we draw the p suborbital do we not get a sort of figure 8 shape whereas a s suborbital is a O shape.
So the only two real shapes in all of atomic physics of the chemical elements is really what? Is it really just O shape for the "s" orbitals and 8 shape for the p, d, f et al orbitals?
Helium is the most stable element yet it has a s orbital the same as the lithium and beryllium columns or families. And those alkali metals are not stable at all. Whilst the last column of the p orbital ends with a inert gas or Noble Gas element.
So, is that stability directly related to Ampere's law of parallel currents attract.
A spin up and spin down in a "s" suborbital, filling the suborbital is a form of Maxwell EM attraction, but is there more of an attraction in the p, d, f suborbitals in that the geometry of those elongated ellipses are following Ampere's law of parallel currents attract?
So that in the inert gases of neon, argon, they are exceptionally stable because not only have they filled their suborbitals of p but given extra stability because the p suborbitals are in parallel for added attraction.
Google's NewNewsgroups censors AP posts and halted a proper archiving ?of author, but Drexel's Math Forum does ?not and my posts in archive ?form is seen here: ??http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986
Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electrondotcloud are galaxies



