In article <05781c68-6213-47d1-a23a-0b3820f710c1@l18g2000vbv.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 21 Nov., 21:14, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > We cannot conclude from set theory that the digits on the right of the > > > > > decimal point vanish. > > > > > > Yes we can. > > > > > No. Set theory does not destruct the set of all natural numbers. Set > > > theory only shows that the set can be enumerated by the set of all > > > even numbers, .i.e., all inidces disappear left and gather right. > > > > Absolute nonsense. This is not even wrong.- > > The typical answer of a man who has not understood. But my explanation > may really be a bit too hard for you. So let us stay on a lower level > and simply continue: > > > > Yes we can. > > Can we etsimate by means of set theory how many digits *left* to the > decimal point will be present in the limit (as calculated by > analytical means) of the real sequence
That question does not make any sense as written. --
