In article <addf68fc-fef6-4d32-9962-158449bcbab1@e25g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> No, yours is a much more difficult case. That's why I conceived the > simplest case.
WM does not conceive at all that there are TWO SEPARATE SEQUENCES involved, which quite properly behave differently.
The real number case involves a single strictly increasing and unbounded sequence of distinct real numbers, which involves one form of limiting process.
The set of digits case involves two disjoint sequences of sets of digits, each of which involves an entirely different form of limiting process than does the sequence of real numbers case.
That WM tries to conflate these different interpretations is, as usual, something that only works in Wolkenmuekenheim. --
