On 23 Nov., 03:20, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > Analysis gives a result. Set > > theory gives another result which is incompatible with analysis. > > But if so, they are dealing with different questions.
They are not dealing with different questions but with one and the same: What is the number of digits left to the point in the limit of the infinite real sequence determining this limit uniquely.
They are applying different techniques. And they are obtaining different results. In other branches of mathematics such a case would be called a contradiction. Of course in set theory, we have Orwell's cattle of sheep shouting down all other voices "There is no contradiction, there is no contradiction, ..."