On 23 Nov., 17:09, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Nov 23, 11:56 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On the contrary, the fact that the analytic *limit* > cannot be described in terms of digits is > the point.
A further explanation may be appropriate: In your example set theory is not in contradiction with analysis. Both theories prove the existence of infinitely many digits and both cannot fix the position of the leading 1.
My example shows a contradiction. Here only analysis proves the existence of infinitely many digits left to the point while set theory proves no digit left.
