On Nov 23, 2:23 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > On 23 Nov., 19:12, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It's still Piffle to say > > > Analysis infers from the limit the number of required digits > > It is obvious that you don't like analysis. Try to understand the > function called logarithm with base 10. The number of digits is [lgx] > + 1.
Saying oo has an infinite number of digits is nonsense (even though saying log_10(oo)+1 = oo is not nonsense). Your claim that oo requires digits is Piffle.