On Nov 23, 3:38 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > On 23 Nov., 19:51, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > <snip>
> > Saying oo has an infinite number of digits is nonsense > > It is not nonsense
Well, looks like communication has come to a halt.
You are correct, if analysis requires that oo be described by digits then there is a contradiction in mathematics. I see no way of convincing you that oo cannot be expressed by digits, nor have you given any evidence other that vague handwaving that it can.
