On Nov 26, 3:24 am, George Greene <gree...@email.unc.edu> wrote: > On Nov 24, 3:38 pm, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > You argue logically until you're shown wrong, > > If the argument is logical then IT CAN'T be "shown wrong". > > > then quote scripture as backup. > > I'm not doing anything as a backup. A proof is a proof. > If you read it and aren't convinced, then it's a proof of AN > ADDITIONAL thing: YOU'RE STUPID. > > > You have never supported one single assertion in 10 years on your own. > > So FUCKING what?? > The fact that somebody else figured something out before I did does > not make it LESS true! > More to the point, if I thought I had figured it out on my own, BUT > NOBODY ELSE WAS CONVINCED, > that probably WOULD make it less true! That is certainly the dynamic > that applies in your personal case. > > > Keep starting out that window, and give other people a chance to > > contribute before you trash every single thread in sci.logic with > > scripture. None of it holds up, PERIOD. > > It all holds up. The fact that you don't understand WHY it holds up > is why you get attacked all the time. >
No use arguing with liars, cheaters and stealers.
Nothing that makes all it's practitioners run and hide every time a flaw is posted "holds up" by any standard.