|
|
Re: Matheology § 162
Posted:
Nov 26, 2012 4:15 AM
|
|
On 26 Nov., 08:37, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> But the non-analytical limit that exists for the sequence of sets of
> digit positions also exists and is quite different from what WM's
> delusions claim.
Anyhow, set theory yields results for limits of analytical sequences
that are in contradiction with the results of analysis.
Regards, WM
|
|
