On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Haim <email@example.com> wrote: ... > The original statement by Paul is: Here is some proof. Unless Paul actually does not know what he is talking about (I remain agnostic on this point), of course he did not mean proof, he meant evidence. You remained silent on whether Paul is talking gibberish or whether he just misspoke. >
Oh please. I most certainly meant what I said.
(Do I need to spell out everything to the literalist, conservative mind that has problems handling more than one use of a term in English? Evidently.)