The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Inactive » math-history-list

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Paper on: The Geometric Grids of The Hieratic Numeral Signs
Replies: 8   Last Post: Nov 29, 2012 12:30 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Milo Gardner

Posts: 1,105
Registered: 12/3/04
Re: Paper on: The Geometric Grids of The Hieratic Numeral Signs
Posted: Nov 26, 2012 9:01 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Grids do not parse Egypt's numeration systems. the Old Kingdom's binary infinite series, or the Middle Kingdom's finite system shared with classical Greeks, Hellenes and Arabs until 800 AD.

To directly parse square root and its numeration system from any culture, math facts must be understood in
precise details, decoded from ancient texts.

Middle Kingdom Egyptians and Greeks scaled rational numbers by finding an LCM m such that

n/p x m/m = mn/mp

The best divisors of mp were selected that best summed to numerator mp.

Egyptians stressed 1/p and 2/p conversions to teach students to convert n/p to concise unit fractions,
series. There are 10 or more ancient texts that describe this system.

Available Greek era texts offer n/p tables thereby included 1/p, 2/p ... (n-1)/p conversions. For example,
an implici Hibeh Papytrust n/45 table written in 300 BC may be of interest .. TRIVIAL LCM 1, 2 AND 4.

square root was reported by Gillings and R,C, Archibald in a 200 BCE text (page 217 .. MATH IN THE TIME OF THE PHARAOHS ...

SQUARE ROOT OF 164 = 12 + 2/3 + 1/15 + 1/26 + 1/32

without citing the historical method.

The method following Occam's razor says

164^1/2 is nearly (12 + 4/5)2 =

144 + 48/5 + 48/5 + 16/25 = 163 + 21/25

the scribe then converted to unit fraction series by

(4/5 - 2/3) = (2 /15 - 1/15) = 1/15

(1/15 - 1/26) = (21/410)

or, more likely a miss reading of 1/26 is better read as 1/24

(1/15 - 1/24) = 1/40 as Archibald suggests

The scribe then replaced 1/40 with 1/32 since 163 21/25 was not near enough to his professional standard.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.