>>On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Haim >><firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: >>... >> The original statement by Paul is: Here is some proof. >> Unless Paul actually does not know what he is talking >> about (I remain agnostic on this point), of course he >> did not mean proof, he meant evidence. You remained >> silent on whether Paul is talking gibberish or whether >> he just misspoke. > >Oh please. I most certainly meant what I said.
That is what I really thought, but I was trying to be kind.