Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Topic: Cantor's first proof in DETAILS
Replies: 85   Last Post: Dec 10, 2012 7:23 AM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 ross.finlayson@gmail.com Posts: 2,713 Registered: 2/15/09
Re: Cantor's first proof in DETAILS
Posted: Nov 27, 2012 12:19 AM

On Nov 26, 12:03 pm, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> In article
>  "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlay...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

> > On Nov 25, 11:22 pm, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <be566287-1de6-426b-a9d8-420bb9279...@n2g2000pbp.googlegroups.com>,
> > > "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlay...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> > > > EF is simple and it's defined simply as a function, not-a-real-
> > > > function, standardly modeled by real functions. Dirac's delta and
> > > > Heaviside's are as so defined, as functions, not-real-functions,
> > > > standardly modeled by real functions. And, the definition of function
> > > > itself, here is modern and reflects over time the development of the
> > > > definition of what is a mathematical function. Then, in actually
> > > > extending the definition of what are the real numbers, in A theory, it
> > > > is directly defined, and applied.

>
> > > > There are hundreds of essays on it here.
>
> > > Then give a reference to some of them, preferably by someone other than
> > > yourself.

>
> > > In particular we need a mathematically satisfactorily definition of your
> > > alleged EF, again preferably by someone other than yourself, which will
> > > take it out of the realm of mythology.
> > > --

>
> > I wrote all that.
>
> Did you?
>
> I certainly do not ever recall seeing your alleged EF adequately
> presented, and see now no references to where one might see it
> presented, whether adequately or not.
>
> And if you still will not provide a reference to it, a url, or something
> through which anyone can access it to see it for him or her self, it is
> as if no such thing ever existed.
>
> Which in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, I will continue to
> assume.
> --

http://mathforum.org/kb/search!execute.jspa?forumID=13&objID=f13&forceEmptySearch=true&q=%22Equivalency+Function%22
at least hundreds of results

http://mathforum.org/kb/message.jspa?messageID=7888348 "Cantor-
Finlayson theory"

"Equivalency Function"

the first mention

Do you know the old saw about "assume"?

My friends, or as I would so address you, the definition of EF is
written in some few lines: constantly monotonically increasing from
zero through one.

Regards,

Ross Finlayson

Date Subject Author
11/25/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
11/25/12 Virgil
11/25/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
11/25/12 Graham Cooper
11/25/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
11/25/12 Virgil
11/25/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
11/26/12 Virgil
11/26/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
11/26/12 Virgil
11/26/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
11/26/12 Virgil
11/27/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
11/27/12 Virgil
11/27/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
11/27/12 Virgil
11/27/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
11/28/12 Virgil
11/28/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
11/28/12 Virgil
11/28/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
11/28/12 Virgil
11/29/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
11/29/12 Virgil
11/29/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
11/30/12 Virgil
11/30/12 FredJeffries@gmail.com
11/30/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
11/30/12 FredJeffries@gmail.com
11/30/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/1/12 Virgil
11/30/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/1/12 Virgil
12/1/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/1/12 Virgil
12/1/12 FredJeffries@gmail.com
12/1/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/1/12 Virgil
12/2/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/2/12 Virgil
12/2/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/2/12 Virgil
12/3/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/3/12 Virgil
12/3/12 Virgil
12/3/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/3/12 Virgil
12/3/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/4/12 Virgil
12/4/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/4/12 Virgil
12/4/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/4/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/4/12 Virgil
12/4/12 Virgil
12/4/12 Virgil
12/5/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/6/12 Virgil
12/7/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/7/12 Virgil
12/8/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/9/12 Virgil
12/9/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/9/12 Virgil
12/9/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/9/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/9/12 Virgil
12/9/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/9/12 Virgil
12/9/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/9/12 Virgil
12/9/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/10/12 Virgil
12/10/12
12/4/12 Virgil
12/5/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/5/12 Virgil
11/30/12 Virgil
11/25/12 Graham Cooper
11/25/12 Virgil
11/25/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
11/25/12 Virgil