|
|
Re: Matheology § 162
Posted:
Nov 27, 2012 1:52 AM
|
|
On 26 Nov., 20:55, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > There are not different topologies involved when calculating sets of
> > digits of analytical limits. Nevertheless even you seem to be capable
> > of recognizing that set theory is not suitable for calculating limits
> > of analysis.
>
> While "different topologies" may be overstating the case, differing
> situations is not.
>
> WM compares a sequence of supposedly real numbers and a sequence of sets
> of digit positions, and says that because the limits of such different
> sequences can be different that mathematics has failed.
You have not yet understood. I compare the analytical limit of a
sequence of digits positions and the set theoretic limit of the same
sequence of digit positions.
The analytical limit is obtained via (x --> oo) ==> (logx --> oo) from
the limit of the sequence of real numbers, but does that invalidate
the analytical mathod?
Regards, WM
|
|
