Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.



magnetic current density deriving restmass 1839 and 137 Chapt13.4.05 restmass #1035 New Physics #1155 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
Posted:
Nov 27, 2012 2:35 AM


Now we do have an accurate means of measuring the distances of the nuclei of atoms and the distances of the chemical bond of atoms and we find this measure to be about 10^6 larger for the chemical bond and we know for a fact that the force strength of the strong nuclear force is 10^6 larger than the chemical bond. So from that data, we instantly recognize the Strong Nuclear Force is just a chemical bonding of EM Maxwell Equations of protons with neutrons.
What I am trying to do for the restmass of electron 0.51 MeV and proton restmass 938.2 MeV is a similar comparison with geometry. So that the ratio 938.2/0.51 = 1839.6 is derived from pure geometry, that the size of the proton whether volume or surface area is 1839.6 compared to the electron's size as 1. But maybe we will never be able to measure that.
It was two years ago I wrote these two posts on deriving the mass ratio and the inverse fine structure constant:
sci.physics, sci.astro, sci.math Apr 26, 2:00 pm Date: Apr 26, 2010 3:00 PM Author: plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com Subject: Re: postscript Speed of Light derived from pure math #35; ATOM TOTALITY
Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
(most snipped)
Postscript: Chapter 18: "pi" and "e" and "i" explained; inverse fine
> > structure constant, and proton to electron mass ratio, speed of > > light, > > all linked and explained.
(snipped)
> > So looking back at my posts on this topic, where I finally concluded:
> > speed of light = summation of meridian strips distance / logspiral > > radius
> > Definition: Logspiral radius is the 1/4 of semicircumference.
> > Definition: meridian strips are strips and not lines for they have a > > width > > involved and in the case of Earth in kilometers the width of the > > strips > > is a kilometer wide.
(i) Alright, so I have the number "pi" from pure physics as 22 subshells in 7 shells of the 231Pu Atom Totality
(ii) I have the number "e" from pure physics as 19 occupied subshells in 7 shells
(iii) I have the FineStructure Constant as 22 / (22/7)^7 from pure physics
(iv) I have the mass ratio of proton to electron as 6 (22/7)^5 from the fact that 231Pu has the 5f6 energy level, where the fifth energy level has exponent 5 and the seventh energy level has exponent 7 in Fine Structure Constant.
(v) Now I have the Speed of Light from pure math and it is :
speed of light = summation of meridian strips distance / logspiral radius
Now let me see if I can write that in terms of just pi and "e" where time is in 1 units and distance is in 1 units and using the fifth energy level:
Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electrondotcloud are galaxies
sci.physics, sci.astro, sci.math Apr 26, 2:25 pm Date: Apr 26, 2010 3:25 PM Author: plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com Subject: Re: postscript Speed of Light is the same as Fine Structure Constant #36; ATOM TOTALITY
Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > (most snipped)
> Postscript: Chapter 18: "pi" and "e" and "i" explained; inverse fine > > > structure constant, and proton to electron mass ratio, speed of > > > light, > > > all linked and explained.
> (snipped) > > > So looking back at my posts on this topic, where I finally concluded:
> > > speed of light = summation of meridian strips distance / logspiral > > > radius
> > > Definition: Logspiral radius is the 1/4 of semicircumference.
> > > Definition: meridian strips are strips and not lines for they have a > > > width > > > involved and in the case of Earth in kilometers the width of the > > > strips > > > is a kilometer wide.
> (i) Alright, so I have the number "pi" from pure physics as 22 > subshells in 7 shells > of the 231Pu Atom Totality
> (ii) I have the number "e" from pure physics as 19 occupied subshells > in 7 shells
> (iii) I have the FineStructure Constant as 22 / (22/7)^7 from pure > physics
> (iv) I have the mass ratio of proton to electron as 6 (22/7)^5 from > the fact that > 231Pu has the 5f6 energy level, where the fifth energy level has > exponent 5 > and the seventh energy level has exponent 7 in Fine Structure > Constant.
> (v) Now I have the Speed of Light from pure math and it is :
> speed of light = summation of meridian strips distance / logspiral > radius
> Now let me see if I can write that in terms of just pi and "e" where > time is in > 1 units and distance is in 1 units and using the fifth energy level:
So the circumference of this generalized unit distance and unit time is that of 22
So in the equation of the Speed of Light we would have:
Speed of Light = 22 x 22/ logspiralradius
Now the Logspiralradius is going to be a tiny bit larger than the Euclidean radius of 7/2 = 3.5. Remember the goldenratiologspiral is approximated by 1/4 turn circles, where sometimes it is slightly larger than the radius of the true 1/4 circle.
So we have 22x22/ 3.5 = 138
And the inverse fine structure constant is 137. But if we had the tiny bit larger portion of the golden ratio the philogspiralradius
22x22/3.53 = 137
Now the Inverse Fine Structure Constant uses the speed of light c as in:
hbar*c/(e^2)
But here, I have derived the Inverse Fine Structure Constant from the speed of light itself. How is that possible? Well, I simply removed the hbar and the (e^2) by calling them unit distance and unit time.
So the speed of light is basically one and the same as the Fine Structure Constant.
 end of 2 year ago posts 
Google's NewNewsgroups censors AP posts and halted a proper archiving of author, but Drexel's Math Forum does not and my posts ?in archive form is seen here:
http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986
Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electrondotcloud are galaxies



