On Nov 27, 1:35 am, Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archime...@gmail.com> wrote: (snip) > > > > > So looking back at my posts on this topic, where I finally > concluded: > > > > > speed of light = summation of meridian strips distance / log-spiral- > > > > > radius > > > > > Definition: Log-spiral radius is the 1/4 of semicircumference. > > > > Definition: meridian strips are strips and not lines for they have a > > > > > width > > > > involved and in the case of Earth in kilometers the width of > the > > > > strips > > > > is a kilometer wide. > (snip) > > --- end of 2 year ago posts --- >
Alright, I am excited tonight, for I think I finally found what Faraday's lines of force are. In Old Physics, they dumped Faraday's lines-of-force, saying that they had no physical reality to them and were scaffolding. In New Physics, we dump all of quark theory, all of string theory and all of the Standard Model, because they have no physical reality but are only fake scaffolding.
When you include magnetic monopoles into the Symmetrical Maxwell Equations, what do you get? Well, in the Faraday law you get an extra term called the "magnetic current density".
Now what in the world could that possible be?
Well, come to think of it, with my attempt of deriving the speed of light by asking how much of a width of strip of a ball of radius 1, how much of a width of strip for lines of longitude is required for light to make one complete revolution around that ball as the speed of light? Light travels at 3*10^8 meters/second. Say we are given one second, so the question is how thin of a strip for each longitude line in order to make a distance of 3*10^8 meters?
Now that is the idea behind strips for lines of longitude.
But now, I may have a new helper on this idea of strips for lines of longitude in the fact of Faraday's lines-of-force. Those lines of force just maybe what the Magnetic Current Density is all about.
The moving bar magnet inside a closed loop wire that is Faraday's law, the moving bar magnet creates lines-of-force or a magnetic current density and it thus, causes electrons to flow as a current in the closed loop wire.
So now, if I can tie together 1839 lines-of-force for the proton compared to 1 line of force for the electron, I would be deriving the mass ratio of proton/electron from purely geometry.
Google's New-Newsgroups censors AP posts and halted a proper archiving of author, but Drexel's Math Forum does not and my posts ?in archive form is seen here: