|
|
Re: Matheology § 162
Posted:
Nov 27, 2012 3:25 PM
|
|
On 27 Nov., 19:52, Carsten Schultz <schu...@zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> Surely set theory must be to blame for this!
We have infinitely many digits left to the point in the limit when
calculated by analysis.
We have no digits left to the point in the limit when calculated by
set theory.
This seems to suggest that set theory is not suitable (or willing in
this special case) to calculate the limit, or analysis is wrong. I
would stick with analysis. Of course there is no contradiction because
we know in set theory
Ther?s no con-
tra-dic-tion!
Ther?s no con-
tra-dic-tion!
Ther?s no con-
tra-dic-tion!
(to be shouted to the tune of Orwell's sheep).
Regards, WM
|
|
