Virgil
Posts:
4,482
Registered:
1/6/11
|
|
Re: Matheology � 162
Posted:
Nov 27, 2012 6:06 PM
|
|
In article
<0abccef0-b8f2-4e9d-971a-d502a6409ecf@bq2g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 27 Nov., 20:19, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > If there are no actual infinities, then there can never be any left.
>
> There are always digits left, because the moving to the right is never
> completed.
In the limit, every digit to the left of the deciml point will have been
replaced by a zero digit.
> >
> >
> >
> > > > Your problem is not between
> > > > potential and actual infinity but between
> > > > no infinity and infinity.
> >
> > > Wrong. Analysis has infinity, but not completed. However, this is not
> > > my problem (although I put it) but the problem of set theorists.
Analysis is not a problem for set theorists, but set theroy is a problem
for WM, whose mind is too small to deal with it.
> >
> > It is no problem at all to those set theorists for whom the actuality of
> > infinities is no problem at all.
>
> If you belong to the set of matheologians who agree that 1 = 2 with
> Banach-Tarski, then you will certainly have no problem with the
> present 1 = 0. Since mercyfully set theory is absolutely useless,
> there ís no problem for the rest of the world too.
Sinve "mercyfully" is not a proper word, WM's claim here is absolutely
useless, like most of his other claims.
--
|
|
