Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Matheology § 162
Replies: 78   Last Post: Dec 10, 2012 4:46 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Virgil

Posts: 6,972
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 162
Posted: Nov 27, 2012 6:17 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article
<fa13b22e-fa3e-4114-9a30-a365e2b76e29@dz6g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 27 Nov., 20:14, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
>

> > > > Anyone who needs "(x --> oo) ==> (logx --> oo)" to compute the
> > > > analytical limit of WM's sequence of reals

> >
> > > Again you misunderstand. This relation is not needed to compute the
> > > analytical limit of reals but to compute the set of indexed digits
> > > left to the decimal point, or, as you call it, the limit of the
> > > sequence of sets of positions left of the radix point.

> >
> > Curious that no one but WM needs it for that purpose.

>
> That is easy to explain. You are brain-washed such that you have
> forgotten to do mathematics without completed infinity. Nevertheless,
> it is not forbidden, I assume, to use analysis?


It certainly seems as if someone or something has forbidden WM to use it.

> > > According to set theory the limit set is empty. This is a
> > > contradiction of analysis and set theory.


Analysis says nothing about the limit of the set of nonzero digits, but
does say that the limit of the sequence of numbers involved is NOT A
NUMBER. And being not a number need not have any digits at all.
>
> > Outside of Wolkenmuekenheim every digit position to the left of the
> > radix point eventually becomes occupied with a zero digit which will
> > thereafter remain unchanged.

>
> Sorry, not in set theory. Set theory proves that there is no digit
> whatever in the limit left to the point.


We start with the infinite set of digits to the left of the decimal
point, and while we change their values, at each step will still have an
infinite set of digits However the sequence subsets of that original set
having non-zero values has the empty set as its limit, as each digit
position can be shown to eventually have value zero and keep value zero
thereafter.

But of course, this is much to complicated o WM to sort out, so he keeps
objecting to the obvious.
> > It is amazing how careful WM is to close his eyes and mind to anything
> > he does not wish to understand.

>
> Please try to opne your eyes to thing that you wish to understand.
>
> Regards, WM

--




Date Subject Author
11/25/12
Read Matheology § 162
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/25/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
Roland Franzius
11/25/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
namducnguyen
11/26/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/26/12
Read Re: Matheology � 162
Virgil
11/25/12
Read Re: Matheology � 162
Virgil
11/26/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/26/12
Read Re: Matheology � 162
Virgil
11/26/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/26/12
Read Re: Matheology � 162
Virgil
11/26/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
YBM
11/26/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/26/12
Read Re: Matheology � 162
Virgil
11/27/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/27/12
Read Re: Matheology � 162
Virgil
11/27/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/27/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
Carsten Schultz
11/27/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/27/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
Carsten Schultz
11/27/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
Virgil
11/27/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/27/12
Read Re: Matheology � 162
Virgil
11/28/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
Carsten Schultz
11/29/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/29/12
Read Re: Matheology � 162
Virgil
11/27/12
Read Re: Matheology � 162
Virgil
11/27/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
William Hughes
11/27/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/27/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
William Hughes
11/27/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/27/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
William Hughes
11/27/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/27/12
Read Re: Matheology � 162
Virgil
11/28/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/28/12
Read Re: Matheology � 162
Virgil
11/28/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/28/12
Read Re: Matheology � 162
Virgil
11/27/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
William Hughes
11/28/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/28/12
Read Re: Matheology � 162
Virgil
11/28/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/28/12
Read Re: Matheology � 162
Virgil
11/28/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
William Hughes
11/28/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/28/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
William Hughes
11/28/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/28/12
Read Re: Re: Matheology § 162
Michael Stemper
11/29/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/29/12
Read Re: Re: Matheology § 162
Michael Stemper
11/29/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/29/12
Read Re: Re: Matheology § 162
Michael Stemper
11/29/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/29/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
YBM
11/29/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
trj
11/29/12
Read Re: Matheology � 162
Virgil
11/30/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/30/12
Read Re: Matheology � 162
Virgil
12/1/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
12/1/12
Read Re: Matheology � 162
Virgil
11/29/12
Read Re: Matheology � 162
Virgil
11/29/12
Read Re: Matheology � 162
Virgil
11/28/12
Read Re: Matheology � 162
Virgil
11/28/12
Read Re: Matheology � 162
Virgil
12/10/12
Read Re: Matheology S 162
veronika kočková
11/27/12
Read Re: Matheology � 162
Virgil
11/27/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
YBM
11/27/12
Read Re: Matheology � 162
Virgil
11/27/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/27/12
Read Re: Matheology � 162
Virgil
11/28/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/28/12
Read Re: Matheology � 162
Virgil
11/27/12
Read Re: Matheology � 162
Virgil
11/27/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/27/12
Read Re: Matheology � 162
Virgil
11/28/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
Michael Stemper
11/28/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/28/12
Read Re: Matheology � 162
Virgil
11/29/12
Read Re: Matheology § 162
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/29/12
Read Re: Matheology � 162
Virgil

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.